July results of the Bank Lending Survey in Germany

  • The German banks responding to the Bank Lending Survey (BLS) marginally tightened their credit standards for loans to enterprises in the second quarter of 2022. In the case of loans to households for house purchase, the tightening of credit standards was stronger than at any other time since the introduction of the BLS. Credit standards for consumer credit and other lending were also tightened. The banks justified the tightening in all credit segments primarily on the grounds of a perceived increase in credit risk.
  • Overall credit terms and conditions were tightened in all three credit segments, which was chiefly reflected in a widening of margins.
  • Demand for loans to enterprises increased once again, particularly for short-term loans. On balance, demand for loans to households for house purchase declined, while demand for consumer credit and other lending continued to rise.
  • The NPL ratio again had no meaningful impact on lending policies in the first half of 2022, and the banks are not expecting any meaningful influence for the second half of 2022, either.
  • In the first half of 2022, banks left their credit standards largely unchanged in nearly all surveyed sectors of the economy, reporting a discernible tightening only in the residential real estate sector.

Changes in credit standards for loans to enterprises and contributiong factors
Changes in credit standards
The BLS covers three loan categories: loans to enterprises, loans to households for house purchase, and consumer credit and other lending to households. On balance, the surveyed banks marginally tightened their credit standards (i.e. their internal guidelines or loan approval criteria) for loans to enterprises. In the case of loans to households for house purchase, the tightening of credit standards was stronger than at any other time since the introduction of the BLS. Credit standards for consumer credit and other lending were also tightened. The net percentage of banks that tightened their standards was +3% for loans to enterprises (compared with +3% in the previous quarter), +32% for housing loans (compared with +7% in the previous quarter), and +20% for consumer credit and other lending (compared with 0% in the previous quarter). The banks justified this tightening on the grounds of a perceived increase in credit risk. In the segment of loans to enterprises, this was mainly due to sector and firm-specific factors, but also to the banks’ assessment of a deterioration in the general economic situation as well as to the cloudier economic outlook stemming in part from the war in Ukraine. In the case of housing loans, the gloomier residential real estate market outlook reported by banks coupled with a decline in borrowers’ creditworthiness was the largest contributing factor to this tightening. For the third quarter, banks are, on balance, planning to tighten their credit standards further in all three loan categories. Banks also tightened their overall terms and conditions (i.e. their actual terms and conditions agreed in the loan contracts) in all three loan categories. Increased credit risk was likewise given as the main reason for these adjustments, which impacted margins for the most part.

Change in demand for loans to enterprises and contributing factors
Demand for loans
Demand for loans to enterprises increased again, especially for short-term loans. The reason cited by banks for this uptick was almost invariably the increased financing requirements for inventories and working capital, with many enterprises reportedly having expanded their inventories in response to unstable supply chains and heightened uncertainty resulting from the war in Ukraine. The loan rejection ratio increased slightly on the quarter. On balance, demand for housing loans declined marginally, while the loan rejection rate in this segment rose significantly. Demand for consumer credit and other lending continued to increase, which banks attribute in part to households having less own funds available to finance larger purchases owing to higher costs of living. Over the next three months, the banks are expecting a decline in demand for loans to enterprises and housing loans. By contrast, they expect a further rise in demand for consumer credit and other lending.

The July survey round contained ad hoc questions on participating banks’ funding conditions and about the impact of non-performing loans (NPL) on the institutions’ lending policy. It also contained a question on loan supply as well as loan demand in the key economic sectors.

Against the backdrop of conditions in financial markets, German banks reported that their funding situation had deteriorated somewhat compared with the previous quarter. In the first half of 2022, consistent with banks’ expectations, the size of the NPL ratio (percentage share of gross NPL stocks to the gross book value of loans) had only a marginal impact, or none whatsoever, on lending policy. For the second half of 2022, too, banks are not expecting the NPL ratio to exert any meaningful influence on their lending policies. In the first half of 2022, German banks left credit standards largely unchanged in nearly all surveyed sectors of the economy. Only in the residential real estate sector did they report a discernible tightening. By contrast, they tightened their credit terms and conditions in all sectors. Banks are planning to tighten their standards and conditions across sectors in the second half of the year. According to the banks, loan demand increased in almost all sectors of the economy in the first half of the year, with the wholesale and retail trade being the only sector to provide barely any impetus. Banks are more pessimistic overall for the second half of 2022. In particular, they are expecting a significant decline in the financing needs of enterprises in the commercial and residential real estate sectors.

The Bank Lending Survey, which is conducted four times a year, took place between 10 June and 28 June 2022. In Germany, 33 banks took part in the survey. The response rate was 100%.